Morphometric variability in the round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) (Actinopterygii, Gobiidae) of the Sea of Azov–Black Sea Basin
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abstract
The variability of external morphological characters (36 morphometric and 6 meristic ones) of the round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) from seven regions of the Sea of Azov–Black Sea Basin is considered: the northwestern and southwestern Black Sea coast of the Crimean Peninsula (the Karkinitsky Bay, Donuzlav Liman, and Streletskaya Bay of Sevastopol), the Kazantip Bay of the Sea of Azov, and the Salgir River in the central Crimean Peninsula. As established, the round goby from different catch regions at the age of 2+…3 has different body sizes: the maximum in individuals from the Streletskaya Bay, SLav (136.2 ± 1.97) mm; the minimum in individuals from the Salgir River, SLav (66.8 ± 2.28) mm. With the Mann–Whitney test, statistically significant differences were found between the samples for most morphometric characters. In terms of meristic characters, there were no differences. The greatest contributors to the discrimination of N. melanostomus samples were morphometric characters related to the location of fins. According to the results of cluster analysis, based on the totality of all the studied characters of the round goby of the Sea of Azov–Black Sea Basin, the samples from the Karkinitsky Bay (Samarchik Bay and Yarylgachskaya Bay, D = 28.6) and from the Bakalskaya Spit water area had the highest similarity. At the level of divergence D = 47.3, groups of the round goby from the Streletskaya Bay and Kazantip Bay were united; then, a sample from the Donuzlav Liman adjoined them at the level D = 215. The sample from the Salgir River had the most isolated position: the level of divergence was about 475. As found according to the discriminant analysis, the round goby from the Sea of Azov–Black Sea Basin was differentiated into at least three spatial groups: the first one, from the western coast of the Crimean Peninsula (the Karkinitsky Bay and Donuzlav Liman) and the Sevastopol area (the Streletskaya Bay); the second one, from the Kazantip Bay (the Sea of Azov); and the third one, from the Salgir River. The following characters made the greatest contribution to the discrimination of spatial groupings (with the correlation coefficient between characters and coordinate values along the second canonical axis being higher than 0.75): maximum body depth, caudal peduncle depth and width, predorsal and prepelvic distances, and width of pectoral and pelvic fin base. The revealed heterogeneity shows a high paratypical variability of morphometric characters; under different environmental conditions, individuals of the same species form a specific phenotype.
Authors
References
Андреев В. Л., Решетников Ю. С. Исследование внутривидовой морфологической изменчивости сига Coregonus lavareus (L.) методами многомерного статистического анализа // Вопросы ихтиологии. 1977. Т. 17, вып. 5 (106). С. 862–878. [Andreev V. L., Reshetnikov Yu. S. A study of the intraspecific morphological variation in the whitefish Coregonus lavareus (L.) by multivariate statistical analysis. Voprosy ikhtiologii, 1977, vol. 17, iss. 5 (106), pp. 862–878. (in Russ.)]
Богачик Т. А. Морфологические адаптации челюстно-глоточного аппарата бычков (Gobiidae) // Вопросы ихтиологии. 1967. Т. 7, вып. 1 (42). С. 108–116. [Bogachik T. A. Morphological adaptations in the digestive apparatus of the Black Sea Gobiidae. Voprosy ikhtiologii, 1967, vol. 7, iss. 1 (42), pp. 108–116. (in Russ.)]
Болтачев А. Р., Карпова Е. П. Морские рыбы Крымского полуострова. 2-е издание, уточнённое и дополненное. Симферополь : Бизнес-Информ, 2017. 376 с. [Boltachev A. R., Karpova E. P. Marine Fishes of the Crimean Peninsula. 2nd edition, revised & enlarged. Simferopol : Biznes-Inform, 2017, 376 p. (in Russ.)]. https://repository.marine-research.ru/handle/299011/1356
Васильева Е. Д. Рыбы Чёрного моря. Определитель морских, солоноватоводных, эвригалинных и проходных видов с цветными иллюстрациями, собранными С. В. Богородским. Москва : ВНИРО, 2007. 238 с. [Vasil’eva E. D. Ryby Chernogo morya. Opredelitel’ morskikh, solonovatovodnykh, evrigalinnykh i prokhodnykh vidov s tsvetnymi illyustratsiyami, sobrannymi S. V. Bogorodskim. Moscow : VNIRO, 2007, 238 p. (in Russ.)]
Заброда Т. А., Дирипаско О. А. Оценка половых различий в морфометрических признаках бычка-кругляка Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) Азовского моря // Вісник Запорізького національного університету. 2009. Т. 2. С. 41–47. [Zabroda T. A., Diripasko O. A. Otsenka polovykh razlichii v morfometricheskikh priznakakh bychka-kruglyaka Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) Azovskogo morya. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 2009, vol. 2, pp. 41–47. (in Russ.)]
Зуев Г. В., Болтачев А. Р. Влияние подводной добычи песка на экосистему лимана Донузлав // Экология моря. 1999. Вып. 48. С. 5–9. [Zuev G. V., Boltachev A. R. Influence of underwater quarrying of sand on the Donuzlav estuary ecosystem. Ekologiya morya, 1999, iss. 48, pp. 5–9. (in Russ.)]. https://repository.marine-research.ru/handle/299011/4199
Карпова Е. П. Чужеродные виды рыб в пресноводной ихтиофауне Крыма // Российский журнал биологических инвазий. 2016. Т. 9, № 3. С. 47–60. [Karpova E. P. Alien species of fish in freshwater ichthyofauna of the Crimea. Rossiiskii zhurnal biologicheskikh invazii, 2016, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 47–60. (in Russ.)]
Карпова Е. П., Болтачев А. Р. Днепровская ихтиофауна в гидросистеме Северо-Крымского канала // Сучасні проблеми теоретичної і практичної іхтіології : матеріали V Міжнародної іхтіологічної науково-практичної конференції. Чернівці : Книги-XXI, 2012. С. 101–104. [Karpova E. P., Boltachev A. R. Dneprovskaya ikhtiofauna v gidrosisteme Severo-Krymskogo kanala. In: Suchasni problemy teoretychnoi i praktychnoi ikhtiolohii : materialy V Mizhnarodnoi ikhtiolohichnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. Chernivtsi : Knyhy-XXI, 2012, pp. 101–104. (in Russ.)]
Кодухова Ю. В., Боровикова Е. А., Ежова Е. Е., Гущин А. В. Особенности морфологии бычка-кругляка (Neogobius melanostomus) юго-восточной Балтики // Региональная экология. 2017. № 3 (49). С. 65–74. [Kodukhova Yu. V., Borovikova E. A., Ezhova E. E., Gushchin A. V. Features of the morphology of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in the South-Eastern Baltic Sea. Regional’naya ekologiya, 2017, no. 3 (49), pp. 65–74. (in Russ.)]
Лакин Г. Ф. Биометрия. Учебное пособие для биол. спец. вузов. Москва : Высшая школа, 1990. 352 с. [Lakin G. F. Biometriya. Uchebnoe posobie dlya biol. spets. vuzov. Moscow : Vysshaya shkola, 1990, 352 p. (in Russ.)]
Манило Л. Г. Рыбы семейства бычковые (Perciformes, Gobiidae) морских и солоноватых вод Украины. Киев : Наукова думка, 2014. 243 с. [Manilo L. G. Ryby semeistva bychkovye (Perciformes, Gobiidae) morskikh i solonovatykh vod Ukrainy. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, 2014, 243 p. (in Russ.)]
Правдин И. Ф. Руководство по изучению рыб (преимущественно пресноводных) / под ред. П. А. Дрягина, В. В. Покровского ; 4-е издание, переработанное и дополненное. Москва : Пищевая промышленность, 1966. 376 с. [Pravdin I. F. Rukovodstvo po izucheniyu ryb (preimushchestvenno presnovodnykh) / P. A. Dryagin, V. V. Pokrovskii (Eds) ; 4th edition, revised & expanded. Moscow : Pishchevaya promyshlennost’, 1966, 376 p. (in Russ.)]
Прищепа Р. Е., Болтачев А. Р., Карпова Е. П. Разнообразие бычковых рыб (Perciformes: Gobiidae) Каркинитского залива (черноморское побережье Крымского полуострова) // Био-логическое разнообразие: изучение, сохранение, восстановление, рациональное использование : материалы Междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Керчь, 19–23 сентября 2018 г. Симферополь : АРИАЛ, 2018. С. 259–265. [Prishchepa R. E., Boltachev A. R., Karpova E. P. The diversity of gobies (Perciformes: Gobiidae) of the Karkinitsky Gulf (the Black Sea coast of the Crimean Peninsula). In: Biologicheskoe raznoobrazie: izuchenie, sokhranenie, vosstanovlenie, ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie : materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Kerch, 19–23 September, 2018. Simferopol : ARIAL, 2018, pp. 259–265. (in Russ.)]
Световидов А. Н. Рыбы Чёрного моря. Москва ; Ленинград : Наука, 1964. 551 с. [Svetovidov A. N. Ryby Chernogo morya. Moscow ; Leningrad : Nauka, 1964, 551 p. (in Russ.)]
Смирнов А. И. Бычок-кругляк Neogobius melanostomus (Pisces, Gobiidae) за пределами ареала: причины, степень распространения, возможные последствия // Вестник зоологии. 2001. Т. 35, № 3. С. 71–77. [Smirnov A. I. The round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pisces, Gobiidae) is found outside of its area: Reasons, distribution rate, probable after-effects. Vestnik zoologii, 2001, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 71–77. (in Russ.)]
Смирнов А. И. Фауна Украины. Т. 8. Рыбы. Вып. 5. Окунеобразные (бычковидные), скорпенообразные, камбалообразные, присоскоперообразные, удильщикообразные. Киев : Наукова думка, 1986. 320 с. [Smirnov A. I. Fauna Ukrainy. Vol. 8. Ryby. Iss. 5. Okuneobraznye (bychkovidnye), skorpenoobraznye, kambaloobraznye, prisoskoperoobraznye, udil’shchikoobraznye. Kyiv : Naukova dumka, 1986, 320 p. (in Russ.)]
Ткаченко М. Ю. Морфологічна мінливість бичка-кругляка Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) морських та прісноводних водойм // Біологічні системи. 2012. Т. 4, вип. 4. С. 525–529. [Tkachenko M. Yu. Morfolohichna minlyvist bychka-kruhliaka Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) morskykh ta prisnovodnykh vodoim. Biolohichni systemy, 2012, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 525–529. (in Ukr.)]
Халафян А. А. Statistica 6. Статистический анализ данных. Москва : ООО «Бином-Пресс», 2007. 512 с. [Khalafyan A. A. Statistica 6. Statisticheskii analiz dannykh. Moscow : OOO “Binom-Press”, 2007, 512 p. (in Russ.)]
Belogurova R. E., Karpova E. P., Ablyazov E. R. Long-term changes in the fish fauna of the Karkinitsky Gulf of the Black Sea. Russian Journal of Marine Biology, 2020, vol. 46, iss. 6, pp. 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063074020060036
Buřič M., Bláha M., Kouba A., Drozd B. Upstream expansion of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) – first record in the upper reaches of the Elbe River. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 2015, vol. 416, art. no. 32 (5 p.). https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015029
Ĉolić S., Šukalo G., Ĉolić V., Kerkez V. First record of round goby Neogobius melanostomus Pallas, 1814 (Pisces: Gobiidae) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ecologica Montenegrina, 2018, vol. 16, pp. 108–110. https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2018.16.8
Crossman E. J., Holm E., Cholmondeley R., Tuininga K. First record for Canada of the rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and notes on the introduced round goby, Neogobius melanostomus. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 1992, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 206–209.
Demchenko V. O., Tkachenko M. Y. Biological characteristics of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814), from different water bodies. Archives of Polish Fisheries, 2017, vol. 25, iss. 1, pp. 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1515/aopf-2017-0006
Diripasko O. A., Zabroda T. A. Morphometric variability in round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Perciformes: Gobiidae) from the Sea of Azov. Zoosystematica Rossica, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 392–405. https://doi.org/10.31610/zsr/2017.26.2.392
Langerhans R. B., DeWitt T. J. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. The American Naturalist, 2004, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/422857
Nyeste K., Nyíri K., Molnár J. First record of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) in the Water System of Tisza River. Pisces Hungarici, 2017, vol. 11, pp. 89–90.
Pinchuk V. I., Miller P. J. Neogobius melanostomus (Eichwald, 1831). In: The Freshwater Fishes of Europe. Vol. 8, pt I. Mugilidae, Atherinidae, Atherinopsidae, Blenniidae, Odontobutidae, Gobiidae 1 / P. J. Miller (Ed.). Wiebelsheim, Germany : AULA-Verlag, 2003, pp. 173–180.
Piria M., Šprem N., Jakovlić I., Tomljanović T., Matulić D., Treer T., Aničić I., Safner R. First record of round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas, 1814) in the Sava River, Croatia. Aquatic Invasions, 2011, vol. 6, suppl. 1, pp. S153–S157. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.034
Reist J. D. An empirical evaluation of several univariate methods that adjust for size variation in morphometric data. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1985, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1429–1439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z85-213
Reist J. D. An empirical evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1986, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1363–1368. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-203
Roche K., Janač M., Šlapansky L., Mikl L., Kopeček L., Jurajda P. A newly established round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) population in the upper stretch of the river Elbe. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems, 2015, vol. 416, art. no. 33 (11 p.). https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2015030
Simonović P., Paunović M., Popović S. Morphology, feeding, and reproduction of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas), in the Danube River Basin, Yugoslavia. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2001, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70643-0
Skóra K. E., Rzeźnik J. Observations on diet composition of Neogobius melanostomus Pallas, 1811 (Gobiidae, Pisces) in the Gulf of Gdansk (Baltic Sea). Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2001, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70644-2
Stráňai I., Andreji J. The first report of round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Pisces, Gobiidae) in the waters of Slovakia. Folia Zoologica, 2004, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 335–338.
Thorpe R. S. Quantitative handling of characters useful in snake systematics with particular reference to intraspecific variation in the ringed snake Natrix natrix (L.). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1975, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1975.tb00732.x
van Beek G. C. W. The round goby Neogobius melanostomus first recorded in the Netherlands. Aquatic Invasions, 2006, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 42–43. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2006.1.1.10
Verreycken H., Breine J. J., Snoeks J., Belpaire C. First record of the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Gobiidae) in Belgium. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 2011, iss. 41 (2), pp. 137–140. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.2.11